![]() Make them a combo shooting skill and you'll see it much more often, theres no point in adding more fire/shadow sps in my opinion Display More They are pretty op (assassin) and gunner needs cooldown time rework/ a lil better base speed and it will be quite op. Most of the time seer still runs with a shield even though c60 bows remove them, something to think about. It wont be good for you to be honest, even though it might sound well. I'm only up for removing 'buff removal' debuff from archer's bows but then mages must get their shields nerfed. While archers have anti-crit shield it doesnt help against seer, and seers have combo+very short cds, which already together puts archers to a disadvantageous positions when they must stunlock mages, and even then they say "oh well you can only defeat me in stunlock you're such a loser "įAIR. If you want lv10 shield then whats the point of buff removing partners? if you do lv10 shields then make them 10min cd as well I'd want to see you in act4 running around without shield, which u probably wont do and just sit and wait for rebuff. Mage don't need nerf seer or boost atk need to make mana shield lvl 10 in atk dg its better then seer and ye seer its too tanky but lose some mana.Īh yes c45 staff doesnt exist you're right, mana cannot be replenished in pvp thats so sad If the priority is first or second lets say in swordie's example, its not a big deal for either to be implemented first, I just heard light is the upcoming one for swordie and water for archer which is not very good choice in my opinion I said fire archer sp as the element seems the least used to me followed by dark. the reworks should hopefully come in the future for each sp that needs it I forgot to add to the ma that i am not very familiar with this class as not many ppl play it, but from what i heard what they should add. ![]() Well i did not say that a new sp would balance current issues but it should not bring other inbalance. I dont think that new sp will solve balance issues, I'd rather have a balancing of the current ones and some tweaks in raid system. MA just needs an sp2 rework, a bit of sp3.rework and in general more pve abilities for lvling, as it proves to be pretty difficult. Sp8 is actually pretty good but yeah I agree that mages need LIGHT pvp sp and not dark (someone said in act7 main quest it says its voodoo mage incoming, guess the element.) Mages in general need a boost in atk (all other than seer) and nerf in def (seer) because magic dmg cant crit, therefore it gives a huge advantage to melee/ranged classes. Swordies might need a rework of sp7 and a better fire sp i think, because warrior is pretty slow and not useful for solo grinding, gladiator is pvp and has too little aoe skill, so lots of aoes fire sp would be great. Why? Because there are no water bosses in endgame. It's just that destroyer needs some changes in cooldown rates. I don't agree with archers getting a fire sp, i'd rather have a melee water specialist. If you have a better idea or think I'm wrong about something go ahead and comment I'll appreciate your opinions. ![]() ![]() MA - any will do, a PvE SP with more AoEs spells that could motivate people to give this class a try A second hand SP would be nice as well but I hope to see it on PvE focused sp as well. A PvE sp to see other than archmage wouldn't be bad choice either. Mage - Light(PvP)>Fire(PvE)>Water>Dark(PvE) - Light should be focus as Holy isn't played anymore besides buffs and an extra pvp sp would be nice. A dark sp with second hand weapon would be best choice we lack SPs to use crossbows. Swordie - Dark(PvP)>Fire(PvE)>Water(PvE)>Light(PvP) Reaon: Dark like SP7 is weak ( rework pls ) and bers is mainly PvE. Fire is the best option for next SP, archers could buy a second fairy. If I did not mention then I think it is not such big deal.Īrcher - Fire(PvP)>Dark>Light(PvP)>Water(PvE) Reason: People only level up with AAs or WKs and in FC/any kind of pvp you won't see any other sp than scout (go nerf ) or ranger in some cases. Yo, I think this is the best choice for the sp elements to be done( in priority order ) and how mainly focused they should be.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |